My Blog List

Al Jazeera Syria Live Blog

Al Jazeera Syria Live Blog
Al Jazeera Syria Live Blog live link click picture

Thursday, September 13, 2012

The Mission of Syria at the United Nations

The Mission of Syria at the United Nations


Modern Histrory
Syria fell to the Ottoman Empire in 1516; the latter's rule over Syria lasted four centuries which ended in 1918. The British that occupied Egypt falsely and hypocritically promised the Arabs military support along with liberty and full independence from the Ottomans, if the Arabs sided with them in World War I. Under this promise and the violent policy by the Ottomans of Turkification, the Arabs revolted in 1916. By 1918, the Arabs with British support achieved their goal and entered Damascus . Victory did not come cheap; on May 6, 1916 tens of Syrian nationals were hanged by the Ottomans in Damascus and Beirut . Those brave men are still remembered in Syria and Lebanon by National Holidays known as Martyrs' Day .

In 1918, Syria was declared an independent kingdom under the rule of King Faisal I, son of Sharif Hussein of Mecca; famous for the Hussein-McMahon Letters which had promised the Arabs independence. Unfortunately for the Arabs, France , Britain and the Tsar's Russia had their own secret plans for the region. In a secret agreement known as the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 , France and Britain divided the Middle East into “Spheres of Influence.” Syrian independence was extremely short-lived; in 1920 French troops invaded Syria . After several battles with a poorly equipped and newly established Syrian military, French troops occupied all of Syria and disposed of King Faisal I. In 1923, the League of Nations fully recognized Syria as a French Mandate, in the absence of any prior consultation with the Syrian people.

Syrians resisted the foreign occupiers; in 1925 several battles took place in the region of Jabal el-Arab and in the capital Damascus . The capital was severely damaged by French air raids killing many civilians. It took over ten years of struggle for the French to accept the Franco-Syrian Treaty, which was signed in Paris in 1936. This treaty gave Syria partial independence and a promise of stage withdrawal of French troops from Syria . However, the French did not live up to their promises. During World War II , Syria became a proxy battle arena between French troops loyal to the Vichy government, allied to Nazi Germany and Free French troops allied with Britain . Syria witnessed many battles between the two sides, including air raids, which once again ruined the Syrian capital along with some of the ancient ruins in Palmyra . Syrians however, sided with Free French and British troops as they had promised full independence after the war would be over.

Once again the Syrians had been deceived into fighting a war not their own for nothing in return. France for a second time did not live up to its promise, French occupation of Syria remained and there was a large extent of French influence on Syrian domestic, regional, and international politics. Syrians once again protested; on May 29, 1945 French troops attacked the Syrian Parliament building in Damascus . This move sparked uproar all over Syria and the demand for full independence was stronger than ever. Finally, Syrian independence was discussed at the United Nations Security Council, which demanded a French withdrawal. On April 17, 1946 the last French soldier withdrew from Syria . This day is celebrated as the National Independence Day .

Only two years after independence Syria would be forced into war. After the creation of Israel and the forced Palestinian expulsion from their native lands, the newly independent Syria , sent in its volunteer army along with other newly independent Arab states to help its Palestinian brothers. The Arab fighters, almost all volunteer untrained forces were no match for the British trained and militarily equipped Israelis. Israeli forces managed to occupy seventy-eight percent of the area of what is known as historical Palestine . The Syrian government, among other Arab governments involved in the 1948 war, was not able to purchase weapons from almost any country; on the other hand Israel was heavily financed by the British and the French with all weaponry technologies. U.N. Security Council Resolution 73 (1949) established an Armistice Agreement and the Armistice Line, which in effect set the border from 1949-1967.

Between the years of 1949-1970 Syria witnessed a great deal of political instability. General Hussni al-Zaim and his military followers led the first military coup in modern Syrian history by overthrowing the democratic national government of President Shukri al-Quwatli . Al-Zaim proclaimed himself president of the military junta, executive and legislative branches of the government and all Syrian military forces, in effect sole ruler of the country. Al-Zaim quickly lost any support he might have had due to his western ties, especially the discrete backing of the coup by the United States . Al-Zaim signed several deals with U.S. oil companies for building the Trans-Arabian Pipeline, effectively giving up rights of the country's oil revenue. His rule lasted less than five-months; however, it set the country on a spree of coups that continued for years to come. From independence in 1946 until 1970, Syria had fourteen presidents.

In the late 1950's Syria 's relationship with the west began to worsen due to improving ties with the Soviet Union . In 1957, Turkey , an extremely close U.S. ally and member of NATO, massed its troops on the Turkish-Syrian border and threatened to invade. This and other threats were some of the main reasons Syria agreed to join a union with Egypt . In February 1958, Syria and Egypt formed the United Arab Republic with then Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser as president of the union. However, Nasser dissolved all Syrian political parties, this was one of the reasons the union did not last long. In 1961, only three years later, Syria broke from the union.

On March 8, 1963, the Baath Arab Socialist Party succeeded in the March Revolution. Between the years of 1949-1967 Israel received condemnation several times at the U.N. Security Council for diverting water from the Syrian Golan through the Jordan River . In spring of 1967 many attacks were launched on Syria , Lebanon , Egypt and Jordan . Historical records, especially The Personal Diary of Moshe Sharrett (former Israeli minister), indicate that as early as the 1950s, Israeli generals and leaders were devising plans to capture the West Bank, Gaza , the Golan, Suez Canal , and Shebba Farms. By April of 1967, Israeli officials were publicly threatening to invade Syria . This all came after several condemnations by the U.N. Security Council of Israeli practices against Arabs. Israel had claimed that Syrians were firing on innocent Israeli farmers from the Golan; however, every U.N. report dismissed these allegations and confirmed that Syrian troops were not firing. However, when Syrian troops had fired it was within the rules of self-defense. U.N. reports and resolutions such as: Security Council Resolution 93 (1951) .http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/072/12/IMG/NR007212.pdf?OpenElement which instructed Israel to cease land development in the demilitarized zone between it and Syria ; it also stated that Arabs in the demilitarized zone forcibly evicted by Israel must be returned forthwith. Another Security Council Resolution 111 (1956) http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/109/45/IMG/NR010945.pdf?OpenElement condemned Israel 's attack on Syrian forces and crossing into Syrian territory. These were among the many passed against Israel .

On June 5, 1967, Israel launched an aggressive and unprovoked war against its Arab neighbors. On June 10, 1967, Israel occupied the Syrian Golan; both sides accepted the U.N.'s call for a cease-fire. U.N. Security Council issued Resolution 242 (1967)http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/240/94/IMG/NR024094.pdf?OpenElement which calls for the complete Israeli withdrawal from territories it occupied during the War, including the Occupied Syrian Golan.

On November 16, 1970, General Hafez Assad , then Syria 's Minister of Defense and a leading member of the Baath Arab Socialist Party led the Correctionist Movement , which finally brought Syria long-lasting political and economic stability after the many years of political strife. Four months later, on the memory of the March Revolution, the Syrian people elected Hafez Assad as their president. He continued his endless work on all fronts. On the military front, he quickly began to mobilize the country's military forces to take back its occupied Golan. On the domestic political front, he organized the National Progressive Front in order to get the People's Council (Syrian Parliament) back to work.

On October 6, 1973, Syrian and Egyptian troops launched a surprise attack against Israeli forces that were illegally occupying the Sinai and Suez Canal from the Egyptian side and the Golan from the Syrian side. Both sides made their intentions clear: to liberate their occupied territories taken by force in the War of 1967. Syria was able to liberate some of its occupied territories; however, Israeli forces managed to recover due to a massive U.S. airlifts and support. The Egyptian forces then ceased all operations abruptly and the Syrians soon found themselves fighting Israel alone with massive U.S. airlifts and support on its own. The U.N. Security Council passed Resolution 338 (1973) , http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/288/65/IMG/NR028865.pdf?OpenElement which reiterated 242 (1967), and the calling for a just and comprehensive peace in the Middle East .

Syria did not want the war to end in this manner. Therefore, it launched a war of attrition against Israeli occupation forces on the Occupied Syrian Golan. Due to Syrian support of their leader and the military along with a strong Arab morale, international pressure began on Israel . The U.S. led talks and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger succeeded in reaching a deal with both the Syrians and Israelis Syrian-Israeli Agreement on Military Disengagement (1974) http://www.damascus-online.com/history/documents/disengage.htm . Under this deal, Syria would regain control of a strip on the Golan including the capital of the Golan, Quneitra. President Assad raised the Syrian flag over the liberated land on June 26, 1974. Yet, this joy was short-lived. When Quneitraian citizens returned to their liberated homes, they were traumatized and stunned to find that every home, building, Mosque and Church in the city had been deliberately demolished by Israeli bulldozers and dynamite. Even the city's graves had been dug and robbed by the Israelis, all just days before the Israeli withdrawal, as documented by the BBC and others. The city remains destroyed as living proof of Israeli aggression towards civilians. On December 14, 1981, Israel annexed, the Occupied Syrian Golan; the international community responded with U.N. Security Council Resolution 497 (1981) http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/418/84/IMG/NR041884.pdf?OpenElement , which unanimously called this move, “null and void” and not one country has legitimized it. Since then, every year the U.N. passes General Assembly resolution titled “The Occupied Syrian Golan” which reaffirms the illegality of the Israeli occupation and annexation of approximately 1,500 square kilometers of Syrian land.

In 1979, the Islamic Revolution in Iran overthrew the Shah which ended Iran 's alliance with the west, mainly the U.S. , and thus declared its full support for the Palestinian cause. A year later in 1980, Saddam Hussein's Iraq launched war against Iran . Syria voiced its opposition to this, calling it the wrong war, at the wrong time and against the wrong enemy. Syria was standing by its Arab Nationalistic standpoint, by stating that there must be unity to confront an Israeli occupier rather than regional conflicts. In this case Iraq and Iran had a common policy towards Israel , which they should have focused on. Unfortunately for Syria very few Arab states supported this position. After an eight-year war with nothing accomplished but heavy losses and causalities on both sides, Iraq invaded the small Gulf state of Kuwait in August 1990. This sparked wide international condemnation. Syria took part in the U.N. led coalition to liberate Kuwait , at the same time pointing to the double standards between Iraq and Israel . The quick response to Iraq 's violation of sovereignty had largely outweighed any international response to Israeli aggression. Directly after the first Gulf War, Syria accepted the U.S. invitation to the Madrid Peace Conference , an international peace conference for the Middle East . Letter of Invitation to the Madrid Peace Conference (1991) . http://www.damascus-online.com/history/documents/invitation.htm The conference started in November 1991 and marked the launch of bilateral Arab-Israeli peace talks. These talks were based on U.N. resolutions calling for Israel 's withdrawal from Arab territories occupied in 1967, and on the so-called “land for peace” formula. Yet, these talks were stalled because of Israel 's constant refusal to give back any of the Arab land it occupies.

Syrian-Israeli peace talks came to a dead end in 1996 when Israel refused to discuss a complete withdrawal from the occupied Syrian Golan. For Syrians a complete withdrawal from the Syrian Golan is seen as a key condition of any peace deal with Israel . This was drafted as a condition that if Israel truly wants peace and good relations with its Arab neighbors as it proclaims to the world then it would simply withdraw from the territories it illegally occupies. The Israeli government continues to claim the occupied Syrian Golan is needed for a “buffer zone” from an alleged "hostile Syria " and for water resources needed by Israel . However, it is known that this so-called “buffer zone” is not only illegal by international law, but it also does not stand as a valid argument due to the immediate push for settlements in the occupied Syrian Golan by Israelis directly after the War in 1967. Furthermore, as the late Syrian President Hafez Assad stated “Syrians have an undeniable right to their Syrian Golan than Israelis have to its natural resources.” By late 1999, Israel signaled through the U.S. its will to accept a move to withdraw from the occupied Syrian Golan. This time high level peace talks continued in Washington D.C. between Syrian Foreign Minister Farouq al-Sahara and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. In 2000, Barak tried to exclude the northeastern shore of Lake Tiberis and parts of Jabal al-Sheikh because Israel receives 30 percent of its water resources from the occupied Syrian Golan. Syria made it clear that no single centimeter of Syrian soil will be given away. Statement by Syrian Foreign Minister Farouk al-Sharaa at the Opening Ceremony of the Syrian-Israeli Peace Talks (2000) http://www.damascus-online.com/history/documents/shepherdstown.htm

After serving Syria for thirty years, President Hafez Assad passed away in Damascus in 2000. The country mourned its beloved leader; he had done a great deal for Syria . His leadership and support of the political process in the People's Council (Syrian Parliament) helped the drafting of a new Constitution , http://www.damascus-online.com/history/documents/constitution.htm which laid the foundation of a stable and prosperous Syria . Late President Hafez Assad from his first term in office began land reforms to give rights to the working and farming classes along with building a transportation network. Political stability along with trust in the government and its institutions allowed for economic revenue and the standard of living increased. After his death, the People's Council nominated Bashar Assad, M.D. for the national presidential referendum. On July 10, 2000, Bashar Assad was elected president by the Syrian people for a seven-year term H.E. President Bashar Assad's inauguration Speech to the Syrian People's Council (Parliament) http://www.damascus-online.com/history/documents/bashar.htm . President Bashar Assad has continued on the solid foundation laid by the late President Hafez Assad. Syria continues on the road of political and economic reform, while at the same time witnessing technological advances in science and medicine along with trade and manufacturing.

Syria continues to be a major positive player in the Middle East while at the same time a strong supporter of Arab Nationalism and peace. Syria was a member of the U.N. Security Council during the U.S. 's preparation for invading Iraq . Although Syria , like France , Germany , Russia , China and many other member states, was in political disagreement with the U.S. , Syria has always called for talks with all nations including Israel . However, there must be a true diplomatic sprit in the negotiations and respect for international law. Syria also welcomed the Iraq Study Group's Report on the situation in Iraq and hopes the U.S. administration will not unilaterally act on issues that affect the Middle East . Additionally, Syria continues to work with all friends, partners and allies around the world towards a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in the region.

Saturday, August 4, 2012

The Justice of God: Obama and Putin, both are Communists. - Gamesmanship and lies.


Obama as "boss of bosses"


Obama brings Erdogan into bat
The image the White House used to illustrate United States President Barack Obama's phone call to Recep Tayyip Erdogan conveyed a simple but blunt message, according to the Turkish press: "Whack Bashar, Erdogan Bey". However, in helping overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the Turkish prime minister is hamstrung by a state of disarray in Turkey's armed forces that he helped to engineer.
M K Bhadrakumar (Aug 3, '12)








Obama to Erdogan (and Assad) with Putin in the shadows... what we want is a New World Order team player...

Remember this. Obama is the Communist who said he has the right to whack any American citizen on U.S. soil he wants to!

Batter Up - The Untouchables (3/10) Movie CLIP (1987) HD




Where does everything in the transnational drug trade and banking criminal cartel and New World Order meet? here:
The Justice of God: MI6 - 10 articles - scroll back with Older Posts link right bottom of article to see all articles


The "rebels" which are Death Squads in Syria are from outside the country and outside the Syrian people and are inserted to expand the New World Order Antichrist empire of Satan and Dajjal worshipping IsraHell.

The Justice of God: Obama and Putin, both are Communists. - Gamesmanship and lies.


Obama and Putin, both are Communists. - Gamesmanship and lies.

Obama at bat and then Putin at bat. All pre-arranged dog and pony show to dominate the world together. Remember that both are Communists. 

Thursday, June 14, 2012

NATO preparing vast disinformation campaign [Voltaire Network]

NATO preparing vast disinformation campaign [Voltaire Network]




URGENT

NATO preparing vast disinformation campaign


Member States of NATO and the GCC are preparing a coup d’état and a sectarian genocide in Syria. If you want to prevent these crimes, you should act now: circulate this article on the Internet and alert your elected officials.

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | DAMASCUS (SYRIA) 




JPEG - 140.8 kb
In a few days, perhaps as early as Friday, June 15, at noon, the Syrians wanting to watch their national TV stations will see them replaced on their screens by TV programs created by the CIA. Studio-shot images will show massacres that are blamed on the Syrian Government, people demonstrating, ministers and generals resigning from their posts, President Al-Assad fleeing, the rebels gathering in the big city centers, and a new government installing itself in the presidential palace.
This operation of disinformation, directly managed from Washington by Ben Rhodes, the US deputy national security adviser for strategic communication, aims at demoralizing the Syrians in order to pave the way for a coup d’etat. NATO, discontent about the double veto of Russia and China, will thus succeed in conquering Syria without attacking the country illegally. Whichever judgment you might have formed on the actual events in Syria, a coup d’etat will end all hopes of democratization.
The Arab League has officially asked the satellite operators Arabsat and Nilesat to stop broadcasting Syrian media, either public or private (Syria TV, Al-Ekbariya, Ad-Dounia, Cham TV, etc.) A precedent already exists because the Arab League had managed to censure Libyan TV in order to keep the leaders of the Jamahiriya from communicating with their people. There is no Hertz network in Syria, where TV works exclusively with satellites. The cut, however, will not leave the screens black.
Actually, this public decision is only the tip of the iceberg. According to our information several international meetings were organized during the past week to coordinate the disinformation campaign. The first two were technical meetings, held in Doha (Qatar); the third was a political meeting and took place in Riyad (Saudi Arabia).
The first meeting assembled PSYOP officers, embedded in the satellite TV channels of Al-Arabiya, Al-Jazeera, BBC, CNN, Fox, France 24, Future TV and MTV. It is known that since 1998, the officers of the US Army Psychological Operations Unit (PSYOP) have been incorporated in CNN. Since then this practice has been extended by NATO to other strategic media as well.
They fabricated false information in advance, on the basis of a “story-telling” script devised by Ben Rhodes’s team at the White House. A procedure of reciprocal validation was installed, with each media quoting the lies of the other media to render them plausible for TV spectators. The participants also decided not only to requisition the TV channels of the CIA for Syria and Lebanon (Barada, Future TV, MTV, Orient News, Syria Chaab, Syria Alghad) but also about 40 religious Wahhabi TV channels to call for confessional massacres to the cry of “Christians to Beyrouth, Alawites into the grave!.”
The second meeting was held for engineers and technicians to fabricate fictitious images, mixing one part in an outdoor studio, the other part with computer generated images. During the past weeks, studios in Saudi Arabia have been set up to build replicas of the two presidential palaces in Syria and the main squares of Damascus, Aleppo and Homs. Studios of this type already exist in Doha (Qatar), but they are not sufficient.
The third meeting was held by General James B. Smith, the US ambassador, a representative of the UK, prince Bandar Bin Sultan (whom former U.S. president George Bush named his adopted son so that the U.S. press called him “Bandar Bush”). In this meeting the media actions were coordinated with those of the Free "Syrian" Army, in which prince Bandar’s mercenaries play a decisive role.
The operation had been in the making for several months, but the U.S. National Security Council decided to accelerate the action after the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, notified the White House that he would oppose by all means, even by force, any illegal NATO military intervention in Syria.
The operation has a double intent: the first is to spread false information, the second aims at censuring all possible responses.
The hampering of TV satellites for military purposes is not new. Under pressure from Israel, the USA and the EU blocked Lebanese, Palestinian, Iraqi, Libyan and Iranian TV channels, one after the other. However, no satellite channels from other parts of the world were censured.
The broadcast of false news is also not new, but four significant steps have been taken in the art of propaganda during the last decade.
• In 1994, a pop music station named “Free Radio of the Thousand Hills” (RTML) gave the signal for genocide in Rwanda with the cry, “Kill the cockroaches!
• In 2001, NATO used the media to impose an interpretation of the 9/11 attacks and to justify its own aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq. At that time already, it was Ben Rhodes who had been commissioned by the Bush administration to concoct the Kean/Hamilton Commission report on the attacks.
• In 2002, the CIA used five TV channels (Televen, Globovision, ValeTV and CMT) to make the public in Venezuela believe that phantom demonstrators had captured the elected president, Hugo Chávez, forcing him to resign. In reality he was the victim of a military coup d’etat.
• In 2011, France 24 served as information ministry for the Libyan CNT, according to a signed contract. During the battle of Tripoli, NATO produced fake studio films, then transmitted them via Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya, showing phantom images of Libyan rebels on the central square of the capital city, while in reality they were still far away. As a consequence, the inhabitants of Tripoli were persuaded that the war was lost and gave up all resistance.
Nowadays the media do not only support a war, they produce it themselves.
This procedure violates the principles of International Law, first of all Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights relating to the fact of receiving and imparting information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” Above all, the procedure violates the United Nations General Assembly resolution, adopted after the end of World War II, to prevent further wars. Resolutions 110381 and 819 forbid “to set obstacles to free exchange of information and ideas” (like cutting off Syrian TV channels) and “all propaganda provoking or encouraging threats to peace, breaking peace, and all acts of aggression”. By law, war propaganda is a crime against peace, the worst of crimes, because it facilitates war crimes and genocide.

Monday, April 30, 2012

Lebanon seizes 150 tons of Libyan arms en route to Syrian rebels



Hide-and-ship: Did the US know Libyan weapons were en route to Syrian rebels? — RT

Hide-and-ship: Did the US know Libyan weapons were en route to Syrian rebels?

Published: 30 April, 2012, 02:12

The vessel "Lutfallah II" docks at a naval base at the port of Beirut on April 28, 2012 (AFP Photo / Anwar Amro)

The vessel "Lutfallah II" docks at a naval base at the port of Beirut on April 28, 2012 (AFP Photo / Anwar Amro)


The US and NATO have some questions to answer about the massive weapons cargo seized by Lebanese intelligence officials, Franklin Lamb tells RT. He says they surely knew the shipment was on its way to Syrian rebels, but still turned a blind eye.

The Sierra Leone-registered ship Lutfallah II, carrying three containers filled with heavy machine guns, shells, rockets, rocket launchers and other explosives has been intercepted over allegations that the arms were intended for Syrian rebel consumption. Some of the arms seized were labeled as Libyan.

The ship's 11 crew members were detained and questioned by Lebanese intelligence officers. Lebanese military prosecutor Saqr Saqr says an investigation is underway.

The ship was en route from Libya to the northern Lebanese port of Tripoli, according to the ship's owner. Lebanon's Tripoli is a hotbed of support for the Syrian opposition. Official Damascus has frequently complained about arms being smuggled from the area into the country.

The vessel is now being held in Selaata, a port city 50 kilometers north of Beirut.

Franklin Lamb, director of the NGO Americans Concerned for Middle East Peace, argues the nearly-successful delivery could hardly have come as a surprise to the US and NATO.

RT: The shipment of smuggled weapons intercepted by Lebanon highlights a long-running issue. Is it high time for an international arms embargo on Syria?

Franklin Lamb: This latest seizure of arms may be a major development in the Syrian uprising and what lies ahead for this region.

There is an eyewitness, Hassan Diab, who saw the ship Lutfallah II, carrying a Sierra Leone flag, being loaded in Benghazi, Libya. We know that Qatar and Saudi Arabia control five warehouses in the area of Benghazi. So the great suspicion is that the intercepted arms are from those left over from the Libya campaign.

The craft was loaded with three containers filled with 150 tons of weapons, though apparently the initial plan was to send as many as 15 containers.

The boat went from Tripoli to Turkey, back down to Egypt and then to Libya, then to Tripoli, Lebanon. It was seized on the way there.

What is remarkable about that adventure is that the Americans almost surely knew about it. NATO did. The Israelis did not touch the ship this time. The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) did not stop this ship.

It seems very clear that with all the differences (and we could name twenty or more) between the situation in Libya and the situation in Syria, the fundamental pillar – a regime change – is identical. This ship clearly headed to the so-called Free Syrian Army as other shipments have come from Lebanon into Syria. So, if anyone has to answer for the incident now, it is Washington and certainly Brussels with NATO. They have to say what they know about the ship.

___________________________________

See this Link

miko's blog: Europa & Palestine News « Kawther Salam « Mossad


Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Al-Bushra Updates: Syria Crisis: Caritas Lebanon Shelters Families Fl...

Al-Bushra Updates: Syria Crisis: Caritas Lebanon Shelters Families Fl...

We seek to keep you literally "updated" on movement in terms of truth and justice in the Middle East in general with a particular eye on Palestine. The links below will take you to various articles and websites that offer the perspective of leaders in the religious, NGO, and human rights communities. Additionally, Al-Bushra, ever vigilant, provides links to regular reporting as well as opinion pieces by journalists. The dates given here indicate when the link was posted; the most recent posting is at the top. Check the article itself for the date of publication.
Friday, March 16, 2012
Syria Crisis: Caritas Lebanon Shelters Families Fleeing Violence

From CNS, staff and others | MARCH 26, 2012



Even as former U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan rushed to Damascus to meet Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad on March 10 in a futile effort to achieve a ceasefire, church aid workers were scrambling to find housing for hundreds of Syrian refugees fleeing the increasing violence. About 200 families made their way to the border town of Qaa in the Bekaa Valley in eastern Lebanon on March 5 and were struggling in the region’s near-freezing temperatures.

The Rev. Simon Faddoul, president of Caritas Lebanon, said that “women and children and the elderly are coming out in the cold with nothing but the clothes on their backs.” The United Nations reported that as many as 2,000 Syrians crossed into Lebanon on March 5 and 6 to escape violence that has claimed hundreds of lives as President al-Assad continues a brutal crackdown on resistance to his regime.

Father Faddoul said most of the refugees arrived on foot from areas near the besieged city of Homs. “They are leaving the young men behind in Syria to guard their houses” from attack, Father Faddoul said. “These are people fleeing from war, their homes under bombardment.” Before the latest surge, about 100 families had fled to Lebanon and were receiving assistance from Caritas, the priest said. Father Faddoul estimated that about 40 of the newly arrived families were Christian; the rest were Muslim.

“This has nothing to do with religion. Whenever there is suffering, we have to be there with them and to help them,” he said. Father Faddoul said the availability of adequate housing in the poverty-stricken town of Qaa is limited. About 35 refugees are currently crammed into small rooms, but Caritas is collaborating with municipal officials to locate homes that three or four families could share.

Caritas Lebanon has had a regular presence in the Bekaa Valley, coordinating programs in agriculture to address the region’s poverty. “Now we have so many [new] concerns—how to find shelters, especially if the situation [in Syria] drags on,” Faddoul said. “We hope the situation doesn’t deteriorate further,” he added.

In Ottawa, Ontario, Carl Hetu, national director of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, said his agency was monitoring the situation of Christians in Syria. “Right now,” he said, “there are thousands of people who are displaced. Among them are Christians, but that has been because of the conflict, not because of direct attacks on them.” Many fear that as the uprising among Syria’s primarily Sunni majority persists, minority groups, like the politically powerful Alawites and the nation’s Christian communities, could become targets for sectarian reprisals.

“Christians are stuck between a rock and a hard place,” Hetu said. “They cannot show approval of the Assad government, but they have to be careful, because they can’t be seen to be supporting the rebels, either.”

Mr. Hetu said his agency was preparing for a possible massive influx of Syrian refugees to neighboring Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, should the already tense situation grow worse. “Our offices in Jordan and Beirut are expecting the worst if the country goes into wide civil war or the Assad government falls,” he said.

Source: http://www.americamagazine.org/content/signs.cfm?signid=961

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Syria: Syria and Cyprus in the New World Order Expansionist Plan

Syria: Syria and Cyprus in the New World Order Expansionist Plan

The predictable reaction and hypocritical contradictions in that is expressed excellently by James Petras below.

The bloody genocidal crimes of the "Triple Alliance," the "Western, Israeli and Gulf State-funded power grab" by the "Washington-EU-Riyadh-Tel Aviv axes" of "Washington, Riyadh, Tel Aviv, Ankara and London," are exposed for what they are.

The Official James Petras website » The Bloody Road to Damascus: The Triple Alliance’s War on a Sovereign State


The Bloody Road to Damascus: The Triple Alliance’s War on a Sovereign State

03.09.2012 :: Middle East
Introduction: There is clear and overwhelming evidence that the uprising to overthrow President Assad of Syria is a violent, power grab led by foreign-supported fighters who have killed and wounded thousands of Syrian soldiers, police and civilians, partisans of the government and its peaceful opposition.




The outrage expressed by politicians in the West and Gulf State and in the mass media, about the ‘killing of peaceful Syrian citizens protesting injustice’ is cynically designed to cover up the documented reports of violent seizure of neighborhoods, villages and towns by armed bands, brandishing machine guns and planting road-side bombs.

The assault on Syria is backed by foreign funds, arms and training.Due to a lack of domestic support ,however, to be successful, direct foreign military intervention will be necessary. For this reason a huge propaganda and diplomatic campaign has been mounted to demonize the legitimate Syrian government. The goal is to impose a puppet regime and strengthen Western imperial control in the Middle East. In the short run, this will further isolate Iran in preparation for a military attack by Israel and the US and, in the long run, it eliminates another independent secular regime friendly to China and Russia.

In order to mobilize world support behind this Western, Israeli and Gulf State-funded power grab, several propaganda ploys have been used to justify another blatant violation of a country’s sovereignty after their successful destruction of the secular governments of Iraq and Libya.

The Larger Context: Serial Aggression

The current Western campaign against the independent Assad regime in Syria is part of a series of attacks against pro-democracy movements and independent regimes from North Africa to the Persian Gulf. The imperial-militarist response to the Egyptian democracy movement that overthrew the Mubarak dictatorship was to back the military junta’s seizure of power and murderous campaign to jail, torture and assassinate over 10,000 pro-democracy protestors.

Faced with similar mass democratic movements in the Arab world, the Western-backed Gulf autocratic dictators crushed their respective uprisings in Bahrain, Yemen and Saudi Arabia. The assaults extended to the secular government in Libya where NATO powers launched a massive air and sea bombardment in support of armed bands of mercenaries thereby destroying Libya’s economy and civil society. The unleashing of armed gangster-mercenaries led to the savaging of urban life in Libya and devastation in the countryside. The NATO powers eliminated the secular regime of Colonel Gadhafi and along with having him murdered and mutilated by its mercenaries.Nato oversaw the wounding, imprisonment, torture and elimination of tens of thousands of civilian Gadhafi supporters and government workers.NATO backed the puppet regime as it embarked on a bloody pogrom against Libyan citizens of sub-Saharan African ancestry as well a sub-Sahara African immigrant workers – groups who had benefited from Gadhafi’s generous social programs. The imperial policy of ruin and rule in Libya serves as “the model” for Syria: Creating the conditions for a mass uprising led by Muslim fundamentalists, funded and trained by Western and Gulf State mercenaries.

The Bloody Road From Damascus to Teheran

According to the State Department ‘The road to Teheran passes through Damascus’: The strategic goal of NATO is to destroy Iran’s principal ally in the Middle East; for the Gulf absolutist monarchies the purpose is to replace a secular republic with a vassal theocratic dictatorship; for the Turkish government the purpose is to foster a regime amenable to the dictates of Ankara’s version of Islamic capitalism; for Al Qaeda and allied Salafi and Wahabi fundamentalists a theocratic Sunni regime, cleansed of secular Syrians, Alevis and Christians, will serve as a trampoline for projecting power in the Islamic world; and for Israel a blood-drenched divided Syria will further ensure its regional hegemony. It was not without prophetic foresight that the uber-Zionist US Senator Joseph Lieberman demanded days after the ‘Al Queda’ attack of September 11, 2001: “First we must go after Iran, Iraq and Syria” before considering the actual authors of the deed.

The armed anti-Syrian forces reflect a variety of conflicting political perspectives united only by their common hatred of the independent secular, nationalist regime which has governed the complex, multi-ethnic Syrian society for decades. The war against Syria is the principle launching pad for a further resurgence of Western militarism extending from North Africa to the Persian Gulf, buttressed by a systematic propaganda campaign proclaiming NATO’s democratic, humanitarian and ‘civilizing’ mission on behalf of the Syrian people.

The Road to Damascus is Paved with Lies

An objective analysis of the political and social composition of the principle armed combatants in Syria refutes any claim that the uprising is in pursuit of democracy for the people of that country. Authoritarian fundamentalist fighters form the backbone of the uprising. The Gulf States financing these brutal thugs are themselves absolutist monarchies. The West, after having foisted a brutal gangster regime on the people of Libya, can make no claim of ‘humanitarian intervention’.

The armed groups infiltrate towns and use population centers as shields from which they launch their attacks on government forces. In the process they force thousands of citizens from their homes, stores and offices which they use as military outposts. The destruction of the neighborhood of Baba Amr in Homs is a classic case of armed gangs using civilians as shields and as propaganda fodder in demonizing the government.

These armed mercenaries have no national credibility with the mass of Syrian people. One of their main propaganda mills is located in the heart of London, the so-called “Syrian Human Rights Observatory” where it coordinates closely with British intelligence turning out lurid atrocity stories to whip up sentiment in favor of a NATO intervention. The kings and emirs of the Gulf States bankroll these fighters. Turkey provides military bases and controls the cross-border flow of arms and the movement of the leaders of the so-called “Free Syrian Army”. The US, France and England provide the arms, training and diplomatic cover. Foreign jihadist-fundamentalists, including Al Qaeda fighters from Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan, have entered the conflict. This is no “civil war”. This is an international conflict pitting an unholy triple alliance of NATO imperialists, Gulf State despots and Muslim fundamentalists against an independent secular nationalist regime. The foreign origin of the weapons, propaganda machinery and mercenary fighters reveals the sinister imperial, ‘multi-national’ character of the conflict. Ultimately the violent uprising against the Syrian state represents a systematic imperialist campaign to overthrow an ally of Iran, Russia and China, even at the cost of destroying Syria’s economy and civil society, fragmenting the country and unleashing enduring sectarian wars of extermination against the Alevi and Christian minorities, as well as secular government supporters.

The killings and mass flight of refugees is not the result of gratuitous violence committed by a blood thirsty Syrian state. The Western backed militias have seized neighborhoods by force of arms, destroyed oil pipelines, sabotaged transportation and bombed government buildings. In the course of their attacks they have disrupted basic services critical to the Syrian people including education, access to medical care, security, water, electricity and transportation. As such, they bear most of the responsibility for this “humanitarian disaster”, (which their imperial allies and UN officials blame on Syrian security and armed forces). The Syrian security forces are fighting to preserve the national independence of a secular state, while the armed opposition commits violence on behalf of their foreign pay-masters – in Washington, Riyadh, Tel Aviv, Ankara and London.

Conclusions

The Assad regime’s referendum last month drew millions of Syrian voters in defiance of Western imperialist threats and terrorist calls for a boycott. This clearly indicated that a majority of Syrians prefer a peaceful, negotiated settlement and reject mercenary violence. The Western-backed Syrian National Council and the Turkish and Gulf States-armed “Free Syrian Army” flatly rejected Russian and Chinese calls for an open dialogue and negotiations which the Assad regime has accepted. NATO and Gulf State dictatorships are pushing their proxies to pursue violent “regime change”, a policy which already has caused the death of thousands of Syrians. US and European economic sanctions are designed to wreck the Syrian economy, in the expectation that acute deprivation will drive an impoverished population into the arms of their violent proxies. In a repeat of the Libya scenario, NATO proposes to “liberate” the Syrian people by destroying their economy, civil society and secular state.

A Western military victory in Syria will merely feed the rising frenzy of militarism. It will encourage the West, Riyadh and Israel to provoke a new civil war in Lebanon. After demolishing Syria, the Washington-EU-Riyadh-Tel Aviv axes will move on to a far bloodier confrontation with Iran.

The horrific destruction of Iraq, followed by Libya’s post-war collapse provides a terrifying template of what is in store for the people of Syria: A precipitous collapse of their living standards, the fragmentation of their country, ethnic cleansing, rule by sectarian and fundamentalist gangs, and total insecurity of life and property.

Just as the “left” and “progressives” declared the brutal savaging of Libya to be the “revolutionary struggle of insurgent democrats” and then walked away, washing their hands of the bloody aftermath of ethnic violence against black Libyans, they repeat the same calls for military intervention against Syria. The same liberals, progressives, socialists and Marxists who are calling on the West to intervene in Syria’s “humanitarian crises” from their cafes and offices in Manhattan and Paris, will lose all interest in the bloody orgy of their victorious mercenaries after Damascus, Aleppo and other Syrian cities have been bombed by NATO into submission.

James Petras latest book, The Arab Revolt and the Imperialist Counterattack (Clarity Press:Atlanta2012) 2ND EDITION

Monday, March 12, 2012

Syria and Cyprus in the New World Order Expansionist Plan

See the complete articles in each link.

See this for the strife created by and for "Israel" in the Mediterranean and the Levant by the Intelligence-Industrial Complex.

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: Third World Traveler: Irangate: The Israel Connection excerpted from the book The Iran Contra Connection Secret Teams and Covert Operations in the Reagan Era by Johnathan Marshall, Peter Dale Scott, and Jane Hunter South End Press, 1987, paper



The base of operating capability is the Triad, as it is the base of power for the Illuminati and the base for the Military-Industrial Complex and the base for the Intelligence-Industrial Complex as well.




God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: POLITICAL DYNAMICS: Syria is integral to the expansionist plans: "The SSNP called for the creation of a "Greater Syria" encompassing Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan, and Cyprus." - see whole article.



The Justice of God: CIA, CSI: Intelligence in Recent Public Literature Herein is referred to the special importance to Cyprus in the New World Order Expansionist Plan. The twentieth century attacks on Greece and Cyprus via Communist/Western Dialectic has paved the way for the Greater Syria Plan above (which is now being carried out).

Cyprus
Military Intelligence in Cyprus: From the Great War to the Middle East Crises by Panagiotis Dimitrakis. New York: I.B. Tauris Publishers, 2010, 223 pp., endnotes, bibliography, photos, index.
For more than 3,000 years, the strategic location of the isle of Cyprus made it the target of conquests by Greeks, Persians, Romans, and Turks. In 1878, the British, with a view toward protecting its interests in the Suez Canal, signed an agreement with Turkey that allowed Britain to occupy and administer the island. The importance of Cyprus increased in 1888, when the canal was placed under British protection, and island became part of the British Empire in 1914. After a brief summary of Cyprus’s role during WW I, when it served as a staging area and the location for intelligence and communications units, Panagiotis Dimitrakis, a British-educated Greek historian, reviews the island’s military intelligence role and its many controversial players after it became a crown colony in 1925.
Dimitrakis explains that early in WW II, under constant German threat, Cyprus was spared German occupation in part because of a successful British deception operation and in part because of SOE covert operations. These depended on Cypriot informers who also kept tabs on the Greek, Cypriot, and communist factions then seeking power.
After WW II, the British negotiated a military base and intelligence agreement with the Greeks, who were pressing for independence but were hobbled by their civil war. In 1955, the British were surprised by a Greek revolt that their spies failed to detect. (76ff) A long insurgency followed, ending in 1960 with the creation of the Sovereign State of the Republic of Cyprus. (104) Dimitrakis provides a vivid account of how the British managed to retain their bases and communications units.
Dimitrakis also presents a detailed description of the events before and after the 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus. By then the island was a base for U-2s as well as British agents and COMINT sites that had to be protected. Although a cease-fire was quickly reached, the Cypriot government was soon the victim of a sequence of terrorist attacks following the 1979 Iranian revolution. This resulted in the strengthening of British and US bases. By the mid-1990s, Dimitrakis concludes, “Cyprus was deemed the most militarized island in the world.” But by 2007, the situation had calmed and Cyprus became a member of the Euro-zone. Throughout these years of turmoil, however, its intelligence role has functioned well.

Military Intelligence in Cyprus is a scholarly reference work based mainly on primary sources and is not light reading. But it is a sound history of a topic not covered elsewhere and thus a most welcome and valuable contribution to the literature.